Chaz Bunch v. Keith Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Graham did not clearly establish that an lengthy term-of-years sentence for a juvenile offender would violate the Eighth Amendment
• holding that Graham did not apply to an 89-year sentence resulting from consecutive fixed-term sentences for multiple nonhomicide offenses
• holding that Graham did not clearly establish that an lengthy term-of-years sentence for a juvenile offender would violate the Eighth Amendment
• holding that Graham does not apply to “juvenile offenders . . . who received consecutive, fixed-term sentences for committing multiple nonhomicide offenses”
• holding that Graham did not clearly establish that an lengthy term-of-years sentence for a juvenile offender would violate the Eighth Amendment
• holding that Graham did not apply to consecutive, fixed- term sentences for multiple nonhomicide offenses which may result in the functional equivalent of life without parole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).