Chavis v. Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the MMWA’s amount-in-controversy requirement limits the court’s “traditional” source of federal question jurisdiction but does not alter “alternative source[s] of federal jurisdiction,” such as supplemental jurisdiction
• first citing Chavis, 415 F.Supp.2d at 624-25; and then citing Barnes, 249 F.Supp.2d at 739

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).