Skip to main content
· 8/16/2007

Chavez v. Weber

Citations

  • 497 F.3d 796
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19458
  • 2007 WL 2323936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the doctrine of collateral estoppel does not apply when the party sought to be precluded was not a party or in privity with a party to the original action
  • standard of review; if state afforded opportunity for full and fair litigation of Fourth Amendment claim, habeas relief is unavailable even if legal or factual error occurred
  • admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda may be harmless error
  • “[W]hen an issue of ultimate fact has been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot be litigated between the same parties in another lawsuit.” (quoting United States v. Brekke, 97 F.3d 1043, 1049 (8th Cir. 1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Gibson, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.