Skip to main content
· 12/27/2006

Chavez-Huaman v. Gonzales

Citations

  • 214 F. App'x 716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment for defendant on employee's Title VII retaliation claim because \[t]here was no retaliation on the basis of protected activity or any perception of protected activity \ (emphasis added)
  • affirming summary judgment for defendant on employee’s Title VII retaliation claim because “[t]here was no retaliation on the basis of protected activity or any perception of protected activity” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Leavy, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.