New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 6/5/1978
Chaudry v. Chaudry
Citations
- 388 A.2d 1000
- 159 N.J. Super. 566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a Pakistani-American “wife [was] not entitled to equitable distribution by reason of the antenuptial agreement [mahr], which . . . could have lawfully provided for giving her an interest in her husband’s property, but [ ] contained no such provision”
- involving interpretation of an agreement executed in accordance with the customs and usage of Pakistan and, thus, found effective in New Jersey
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Lynch, Kole and Petrella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marschall v. MarschallNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-03-23· cited 31×
- Sajjad v. CheemaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2012-08-30· cited 22×
- Seth v. SethCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-07-31· cited 20×
- D'Onofrio v. D'OnofrioNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-04-03· cited 12×
- Nouri v. DadgarCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-04-07· cited 8×
- Aleem v. AleemCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-10· cited 3×
- Shaheen v. KhanLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-05-21· cited 1×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1974-08-07· cited 2,261×
- Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court· 1933-12-04· cited 183×
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-01-27· cited 170×
- Fantony v. FantonySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1956-05-14· cited 150×
- Daly v. DalySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1956-05-28· cited 74×
- Carlsen v. CarlsenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-01-27· cited 44×
- Woodhouse v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1955-02-14· cited 37×
- Casteel v. CasteelNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1957-06-07· cited 29×
- Ionno v. IonnoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-03-14· cited 21×
- Warrender v. WarrenderNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1963-05-09· cited 19×
- Meeker v. MEEKERSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1968-06-03· cited 16×
- Kram v. KramSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1968-11-04· cited 16×
- Zanzonico v. NeeldSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1955-02-21· cited 14×
- Skillman v. SkillmanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-10-06· cited 14×
- Higginbotham v. HigginbothamNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1966-07-20· cited 14×
- Warrender v. WarrenderSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-05-04· cited 13×
- Woliner v. WolinerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-09-23· cited 12×
- Growe v. GroweMichigan Court of Appeals· 1965-12-20· cited 11×
- Woliner v. WolinerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-02-10· cited 10×
- Hill v. HillCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1970-02-13· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.