Chaudron v. Hunt & Norris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that interlocutory appeal would materially advance the litigation because reversal of the trial court ruling would terminate the litigation, potentially saving 18 months of discovery and trial preparation
• determining that interlocutory appeal would materially advance the litigation because reversal of the trial court ruling would potentially save 18 months of discovery and trial preparation and decide other pending cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).