Chau Ong v. Yu Ting Wang, D.D.S. and Winford Ko, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the 2017 amend- ment to ORS 45.400 “expressly makes the decision whether to allow telephonic testimony in nonjury proceedings a matter of trial court discretion except in specified circum- stances”
• “[T]he trial court’s decision whether to allow telephonic testimony in nonjury proceedings [is] a matter of trial court discretion.”
• “[T]he trial court’s decision whether to allow telephonic testimony in nonjury proceedings [is] a matter of trial court discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).