· 7/20/1981
Federal Case
Citations
- 651 F.2d 355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- § 1823(e) barred assertion of breach of oral joint venture agreement by bank as a defense to liability
- “The FDIC may exercise all powers specifically granted . . ., and such incidental powers as shall be necessary to carry out the powers granted.”
- § 1823(e) makes no exception for agreements initiated by a third party and the obligors
- borrowers could have protected themselves from loss by complying with 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e)
- suit on oral joint venture barred; FDIC protected against “defenses or claims”
- summary judgment granted on defense of oral joint venture agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.