Skip to main content
· 7/20/1981

Federal Case

Citations

  • 651 F.2d 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • § 1823(e) barred assertion of breach of oral joint venture agreement by bank as a defense to liability
  • “The FDIC may exercise all powers specifically granted . . ., and such incidental powers as shall be necessary to carry out the powers granted.”
  • § 1823(e) makes no exception for agreements initiated by a third party and the obligors
  • borrowers could have protected themselves from loss by complying with 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e)
  • suit on oral joint venture barred; FDIC protected against “defenses or claims”
  • summary judgment granted on defense of oral joint venture agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.