Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction prior to trial, and certainly prior to giving the plaintiff ample opportunity for discovery, should be granted sparingly”
• dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction “should be granted sparingly,” and only after complete development of jurisdictional facts should a district court dismiss an antitrust case
• “With the facts not fully developed, a fair and conclusive resolution of the jurisdictional issue cannot be made at this stage of the proceedings.”
• alleged unlawful tying arrangement by West Palm Beach condominium developer was subject to federal court's jurisdiction, where $675,000 of lease payments under alleged unlawful tying agreement were paid by out of state residents
• alleged unlawful tying arrangement by West Palm Beach condominium developer was subject to federal court’s jurisdiction, where $675,000 of lease payments under alleged unlawful tying agreement were paid by out of state residents
• ninety-nine year recreational facilities lease tied to condominium sales

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).