Chastek v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “terms such as ‘unprofessional conduct’ are susceptible to common understanding by the members of the profession,” and, therefore, when combined with the legislative purpose, are not “unconstitutionally vague”
• holding broad terms defining unprofessional conduct within state statute were not unconstitutionally vague
• holding broad terms defining unprofessional conduct within state statute were not unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).