Chasteen v. Unisia Jecs Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on 10th Cir. R. 30.1(A)(1) and Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2) to affirm grant of summary judgment where appellant failed to submit adequate appendix
• stating that it was irrelevant whether the plaintiff understood that the defendant's actions constituted a misappropriation of trade secrets as long as the plaintiff knew of the facts which could give rise to such a claim
• finding it was “undisputed that [plaintiff] had actual knowledge that [the defendant] misappropriated its trade secrets more than six years before filing the instant suit”
• evaluating a Colorado statute materially identical to both the UTSA and the DTSA
• “The principle underlying equitable tolling . . . is that a person should not be permitted to benefit from his or her own wrongdoing . . . .” (alteration omitted
• interpreting nearly identical language in Colorado’s trade secret statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).