Chastang v. Flynn and Emrich Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “where there is a substantial, ifnot complete, identity of parties before the EEOC and the court, it would require an unnecessarily technical and restrictive reading of” Title VII to find a failure to exhaust administrative remedies
• “It is apparent from these facts that the three Turners were, if not the persons, at least among the persons at F&E with whom the EEOC would have had to deal to obtain voluntary compliance”
• “[W]here there is substantial, if not complete identity of parties before the EEOC and the court, it would require an unnecessarily technical and restrictive reading of [the statute]” to deny jurisdiction
• identity of interest between corporation and its officers and directors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).