Chase v. Petroleum Bank
Citations
- 66 Pa. 169
- 1871 Pa. LEXIS 11
Syllabus
<p>1. Obase having balances in a bank requested them to pay a debt for him, agreeing that if they would do so, his balances should be applied to the repayment. The bank paid the debt and Chase gave his note for the amount; it being agreed that the balances should be adjusted in a short time. Before they were adjusted the bank failed and went into the hands of a receiver. Held, that there had been an appropriation of the balances to the note, and that in a suit by the bank on the note the balances were to be deducted.</p> <p>2. The transaction was a contract, the appropriation of the balances being the consideration for the advance.</p> <p>3. After the advance by the bank, Chase could not have checked out the balances.</p> <p>4. The balances could not have been attached by Chase’s creditors.</p>
Judges: Agnew, Read, Sharswood, Thompson, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Erthal v. GlueckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1899-07-28· cited 21×
- York Trust, Real Estate & Deposit Co. v. GallatinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-05-16· cited 19×
- Spotts' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1893-07-19· cited 16×
- Eisenlohr v. EhrichThird Circuit· 1924-02-25· cited 12×
- Barceló v. SaldañaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1931-05-20· cited 7×
- McNair v. DavisFifth Circuit· 1934-02-16· cited 6×
- National State Bank v. LindemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1894-04-16· cited 3×
- Ingber v. Tradesmen's National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-02-27
- Ruppin v. Perkiomen Valley Mutual Fire InsuranceLancaster County Court of Common Pleas· 1924-07-05
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.