Chase v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “bare assertion of non-receipt” could not “raise a genuine dispute of fact regarding whether” defendant sent letter
• concluding a plaintiff’s “bare assertion of non- receipt . . . is not sufficient to raise a genuine dispute of fact regarding whether [the defendant] sent the Response Letter”
• “[I]t is well established that a party may not amend its complaint or broaden its claims through summary judgment briefing.” (quoting District of Columbia v. Barrie, 741 F. Supp.2d 250, 263–64 (D.D.C. 2010))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).