Chase v. Chase

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court erred by finding husband’s ability to pay was “taken to be established” based on discovery sanction striking his pleadings even though sanction itself was within its discretion
• severe sanction of striking husband’s pleadings for willful failure to comply with discovery orders in dissolution action was inappropriate, especially when sensitive matters such as child custody and support were at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Andrews v. Andrews
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-22· cited 18×
• Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Honeycutt
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-12-03· cited 9×
• Rose v. Ford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-03· cited 4×
• McEwen v. Rodriguez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-01· cited 3×
• Cadwell v. Cadwell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-10· cited 3×
• DEPT. OF H & R SERV. v. Honeycutt
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-12-03· cited 1×
• Miller v. Miller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-02· cited 1×
• Engram v. Bryan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-16
• Edgar v. Firuta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-20
• Brownell v. Brownell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-20

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Mercer v. Raine
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-28· cited 263×
• Peak v. Peak
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-24· cited 39×
• Lau v. Lau
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-11-24· cited 10×
• Rhines v. Rhines
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-04· cited 8×