Chase v. Blaisdell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in order to “weed out dishonest claims ... expert medical testimony will help establish the validity of the claim of serious emotional distress”
• holding that, in order to “weed out dishonest claims . . . expert medical testimony will help establish the validity of the claim of serious emotional distress”
• expressing doubts that problem of increasing litigation is real, and if real, would be unacceptable reason for denying recovery in meritorious cases
• expressing doubts that problem of increasing litigation is real, and if real, would be unacceptable reason for denying recovery in meritorious cases
• abrogating the contemporaneous physical injury rule and recognizing a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress
• abrogating the contemporaneous physical injury rule and recognizing a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).