Chase v. Baskerville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining the inquiry broadly as “whether Title II represents a legislative response to a pattern of unconstitutional disability discrimination in public services, programs, or activities generally”
• “Title II’s accommodation requirement applies to almost every interaction between inmates and prison officials”
• “[I]n the context of state prisons, Title II validly abrogates state sovereign immunity and creates a private cause of action for damages against the States for conduct that actually violates the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).