Chase Manhattan Bank v. Motorola, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that clauses providing that a failure or delay in exercising rights does not preclude further exercise of such rights are “routinely enforced under New York law,” citing See CS First Boston v. Behar, 1996 WL 384893, at (S.D.N.Y. July 9, 1996)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).