Chase Home Fin., LLC v. Fernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ does not owe deference to a medical opinion “based solely on the claimant’s subjective complaints.”
• holding that ALJ affording treating physician’s opinion only “partial weight” without marching through §404.1527(c)(2) factors was harmless error
• finding that ALJ properly discounted treating physician’s statement that was “inconsistent with other objective evidence in the record”
• explaining that legal error is harmless if the reviewing court is “convinced that the ALJ would reach the same result on remand”
• holding the ALJ does not owe deference to any portion of a treating physician’s opinion based solely on the claimant’s subjective complaints
• explaining that an error is harmless where correction of that error would not have changed the result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).