Skip to main content
· 9/14/2010

Chase Group Alliance LLC v. City of New York Department of Finance

Citations

  • 620 F.3d 146
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19125
  • 2010 WL 3547606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that on a motion to dismiss, courts “constru[e] the complaint liberally, accepting all factual allegations in the complaint as true, and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff’s favor”
  • “[W]e review the grant of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss de novo, ... drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff’s favor.”
  • \This is not by any means to say that valid Section 1983 claims based on due process violations require exhaustion of state remedies.\
  • “[W]e Citizen Pet., Dkt. No. FDA-2009-P-0411-0010, at 10 (Mar. 15, 2010) (“[T]he statute requires certification where the patent (or patent claim
  • “‘An essential principle of due process is that a deprivation of . . . liberty . . . be preceded by notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case.’” (quoting Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542 (1985)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Walker, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.