Skip to main content
· 10/13/1988

Chas. Kurz & Co., Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 698 F. Supp. 268
  • 12 Ct. Int'l Trade 923
  • 12 C.I.T. 923
  • 1988 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • petition for remission of excise duties was not a \request\ for retroactive application of amended tariff statute
  • petition for remission of excise duties was not a “request” for retroactive application of amended tariff statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Re

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.