Skip to main content
· 11/14/2005

Chartwell Litigation Trust Ex Rel. Chartwell Litigation v. Addus Healthcare, Inc. (In Re Med Diversified, Inc.)

Citations

  • 334 B.R. 89
  • 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2236
  • 2005 WL 3077228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion in limine to exclude the expert report and testimony of defendants’ expert, Peltz, on the value of Addus
  • the expert never determined that the DCF method was inappropriate as a valuation method and failed to explain why he did not use it in his valuation analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stan Bernstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.