· 11/14/2005
Chartwell Litigation Trust Ex Rel. Chartwell Litigation v. Addus Healthcare, Inc. (In Re Med Diversified, Inc.)
Citations
- 334 B.R. 89
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2236
- 2005 WL 3077228
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion in limine to exclude the expert report and testimony of defendants’ expert, Peltz, on the value of Addus
- the expert never determined that the DCF method was inappropriate as a valuation method and failed to explain why he did not use it in his valuation analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stan Bernstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.