Charton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that stopping a person at 2:30 a.m. behind a closed strip shopping mall was lawfully predicated upon a founded suspicion that appellant was involved in some form of criminal activity
• affirming that comments regarding a defendant's refusal \to explain his presence and conduct\ prior to arrest violated the defendant's right to remain silent
• encounter ceased to be consensual when officer prevented the defendant from getting on his motorcycle and riding away

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).