Charlton v. Toyota Industrial Equipment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To demonstrate that a plaintiffs actions are highly reckless, it must be shown that he knew or had reason to know....”
• “Evidence of contributory negligence, standing alone, is insufficient to prove a voluntary assumption of the risk ... ”
• in a Section 402A action defendant was required to show that plaintiff knew or should have known that his actions were highly reckless
• evidence users of forklift failed to pay attention at most constituted negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).