Skip to main content
· 8/25/1893

Charlton v. Southern Pacific R. Co.

Citations

  • 4 Cal. Unrep. 157
  • 33 P. 1119
  • 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1016

Syllabus

<p>Quieting Title.—Mere Possession of Land Within the Limits of a grant to a railroad company, which had complied with the terms of the grant, but had not received a patent from the United States, will not enable such person to maintain an action to quiet title against the railroad company, where he does not show that he was qualified to take land under the pre-emption or homestead laws, or that he settled on it with the intention of filing a pre-emption or homestead claim.</p>

Judges: Belcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.