District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/18/2012
CHARLOT v. State
Citations
- 85 So. 3d 1176
- 2012 WL 1314144
- 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6047
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Insisting on the right to a speedy trial is tantamount to objecting to a continuance of that trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warner, Stevenson, Conner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- McCray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-07-07· cited 73×
- Dorelus v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-09-30· cited 30×
- Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-10-10· cited 22×
- Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-20· cited 9×
- Laidler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.