Charlie Lee Ingram v. Rebecca and Randy Wasson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court may consider its own jurisdiction sua sponte, even if it is not raised by the parties
• noting that placement of an easement created by necessity “may allow for a route of access where one previously did not exist”
• stating that because all of the testimony was submitted by affidavit, the appellate court may make an independent assessment of the witnesses’ credibility
• discussing basic presumptions, restatement provisions, and public policy rationales for implying easements for the purpose of granting “access rights”
• finding reasonable necessity where there may have been other roadbeds, but this was the only one accessible with a two wheel drive vehicle
• affirming trial court’s finding that the prior use element was established by testimony to such use in affidavits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).