Charlie H. v. Whitman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a claim under § 622(b)(7) \would be too vague and amorphous to lend itself to proper judicial administration\
• addressing a motion to dismiss filed in the federal class action
• “Moreover, if, in order ‘to participate fully’ in the foster care system, Plaintiffs are challenging ‘the substance of services provided,’ this is not actionable under the ADA or RHA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).