Skip to main content
· 12/18/2007

Charlestin v. Mukasey

Citations

  • 257 F. App'x 447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming Article 80, UCMJ, attempt conviction for underlying Article 134, UCMJ, clause 3 offense
  • “This interpretation of the relationship between Articles 80 and 134 does not violate the canon of stat- utory construction that penal statutes should be construed strictly because it merely gives effect to the clear meaning of the language of the [UCMJ].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Cardamone, Jon, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.