Sixth Circuit· 7/15/2015

Charles Wright v. Warden, Riverbend Maximum Security Institution

Citations

793 F.3d 670
2015 FED App. 0150P
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12149
2015 WL 4253803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a Rule 60(b) motion was diligently filed when done within twelve months of Martinez
noting that a Rule 60(b) motion was diligently filed when done within twelve months of Martinez
noting that a Rule 60(b) motion was diligently filed when done within twelve months of a change in the law
recognizing Rule 60(b) movant’s diligence in filing within 12 months of Supreme Court decision but denying motion because “diligence alone, while a factor to be considered, is not enough to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances in light of the other factors that counsel against Rule 60(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Rogers, McKeague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.