Skip to main content
· 8/3/1981

Charles Winston Hendrickson and Cecillia Anne Hendrickson v. Reg O Company

Citations

  • 657 F.2d 9
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 10824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a simple ratio test would significantly advantage very large, global corporations
  • finding annual sales of $1,800 in the Virgin Islands satisfies “substantial revenue” as part of a regular course of dealing
  • “[T]he Organic Act requires the same due process analysis that would be utilized under the federal constitution.”
  • “[T]he Organic Act requires the same due process analysis that would be utilized under the federal constitution.”
  • the continuing, purposeful activity of defendant aimed at preserving and enlarging its customer base was such that it could reasonably anticipate being haled into court here
  • where “a prisoner has received some medical attention and the dispute is over the adequacy of the treatment, federal courts are generally reluctant to second guess medical judgments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Weis, Garth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.