Charles Wilson v. Betty Mitchell, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that this court’s two-step analysis is consistent with the Supreme Court’s due process analysis of such prosecutorial misconduct claims
• explaining that the third factor in a speedy-trial analysis calls on courts “to determine whether the defendant timely asserted his Sixth Amendment rights”
• noting that the reason for delay determines the amount of proof that a petitioner must proffer in order to show prejudice
• assuming that presenting the witness with only two photographs where only one photograph was of a man with the same hairstyle described by the witness was unduly suggestive
• presuming district court’s finding was correct where defendant failed to adduce “clear and convincing evidence that contradicted the trial court’s factual determination”
• presuming district court's finding was correct where defendant failed to adduce \clear and convincing evidence that contradicted the trial court's factual determination\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).