Charles W. Hoffritz v. United States of America, Laughlin E. Waters, United States Attorney, and Irwin R. Weiss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• subsequent indictment did not render order denying motion for return of documents before the grand jury nonap-pealable where appellant had asked the district court, for “an order requiring that the evidence be returned to him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).