Charles v. Wolford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “no principled reason why a private class action may employ Teamsters and an EEOC class action may not”
• “hostile work environment claims are not proven using McDonnell Douglas or any other burden-shifting scheme”
• “hostile work environment claims are not proven using McDonnell Douglas or any other burden-shifting scheme”
• hostile work environment claims are not proven using McDonnell Douglas scheme
• hostile work environment claims are not proven using McDonnell Douglas scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).