Charles v. Whitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stressing that \[i]t is apparent\ that the entire site was directed at, and designed to deter, plaintiff's potential customers
• granting summary judgment where the record was “vague” as to the number of customers who encountered the alleged false statements on a website
• granting summary judgment where the record was “vague” as to the number of customers who encountered the alleged false statements on a website
• “[T]o constitute an actionable advertising or promotional campaign, a dissemination of information must reach some numerically-significant quantity of actual or potential customers of the parties’ products.”
• “[Defendants] never intended any human being to read the material [Defendants] posted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).