Charles v. Suwannee Swifty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging possibility of “retrospective [medical] testimony that claimant could have worked during” the period for which TTD benefits were sought
• claimant cannot be denied TTD benefits once physicians failed to inform her she was released to work, \even assuming retrospective testimony that claimant could have worked during this period\
• TTD cannot be denied in the absence of evidence that claimant was informed of a release to work, or should have known he was released to work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).