Charles v. Suwannee Swifty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging possibility of “retrospective [medical] testimony that claimant could have worked during” the period for which TTD benefits were sought
• claimant cannot be denied TTD benefits once physicians failed to inform her she was released to work, \even assuming retrospective testimony that claimant could have worked during this period\
• TTD cannot be denied in the absence of evidence that claimant was informed of a release to work, or should have known he was released to work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Garcia-Vina v. US HOLIDAY HEALTH
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-21· cited 9×
• Holiday Foliage v. Anderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-07· cited 8×
• Cocho v. Continental Baking
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-10· cited 5×
• Amburgey v. Palm Beach County School Bd.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-27· cited 5×
• Delchamps v. Page
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-11· cited 4×
• Florida Hosp. Deland v. Wagner-Vick
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-31· cited 2×
• Boggs v. USA Water Ski, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-13· cited 2×
• Feacher v. Total Employee Leasing/Guarantee Insurance Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-23· cited 2×
• Hillsborough County School Board/Broadspire v. Kubik
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-10

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fulmer-Orlando v. Taylor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-20· cited 20×
• Croft v. Donna Jean Packing Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-29· cited 5×