Charles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “Although [the permissive user of the covered auto] was not the original purchaser of the insurance, he was nonetheless an ‘insured’ under the policy and is, therefore, entitled to the protections of the Shamblin doctrine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).