Charles v. Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting agency’s narrowing of plaintiff’s 21 request “based on a criterion that the plaintiff did not articulate”
• “To allow an agency to restrict the number of documents it deems responsive . . . based on its interpretation of the plaintiff’s purpose in making the request constitutes an unreasonable limitation . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).