Skip to main content
· 1/2/1959

Charles v. B & B Theatres

Citations

  • 106 S.E.2d 455
  • 234 S.C. 15
  • 1959 S.C. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that when the contract is ambiguous in its terms other evidence must be considered to ascertain the intent of the parties
  • “[W]hen the written contract is ambiguous in its terms, ... parol and other extrinsic evidence will be admitted to determine the intent of the parties.”
  • “[W]hen the written contract is ambiguous in its terms, ... parol and other extrinsic evidence will be admitted to determine the intent of the parties.”
  • “[WJhen the written contract is ambiguous in its terms, ... parol and other extrinsic evidence will be admitted to determine the intent of the parties.”
  • “[W]hen the written contract is ambiguous in its terms ... parol and other extrinsic evidence will be admitted to determine the intent of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stukes, Taylor, Oxner, Legge, Moss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.