· 1/2/1959
Charles v. B & B Theatres
Citations
- 106 S.E.2d 455
- 234 S.C. 15
- 1959 S.C. LEXIS 48
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that when the contract is ambiguous in its terms other evidence must be considered to ascertain the intent of the parties
- “[W]hen the written contract is ambiguous in its terms, ... parol and other extrinsic evidence will be admitted to determine the intent of the parties.”
- “[W]hen the written contract is ambiguous in its terms, ... parol and other extrinsic evidence will be admitted to determine the intent of the parties.”
- “[WJhen the written contract is ambiguous in its terms, ... parol and other extrinsic evidence will be admitted to determine the intent of the parties.”
- “[W]hen the written contract is ambiguous in its terms ... parol and other extrinsic evidence will be admitted to determine the intent of the parties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stukes, Taylor, Oxner, Legge, Moss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.