Skip to main content
· 1/5/1994

Charles Talley, Jr. v. Vincent Lane

Citations

  • 13 F.3d 1031
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 108
  • 1994 WL 1938

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the district court is not required to bring issues not raised to the attention of the pro se litigant or to decide them..”
  • ALJ may properly reject a medical opinion if it is 14 inconsistent with the provider's own treatment notes
  • a district court's denial of a petition to proceed in forma pauperis is reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • “Thus, it is within the [defendant]’s discretion to find that individuals with a history of convictions for property and assaultive crimes would be a direct threat to other tenants and to deny their applications.” (Emphasis added.)
  • superseded by statute on other grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cummings, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.