Charles T. Jones v. Ridgely Communications Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming jury instruction stating that issues of whether there was a breach of contract or whether there was cause to terminate employee were questions of fact
• in order to warrant reversal, refusal to give a requested charge must have been erroneous and prejudicial, and the charge must be considered as a whole
• refusal to give requested charge must have been erroneous and prejudicial to warrant reversal
• jury issue exists where evidence is susceptible of more than one reasonable inference
• when general instructions are insufficient to enable the jury to understand fully the law of the case and issues involved, the refusal to give a requested charge is error
• refusal to give requested charge must have been erroneous and prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).