Charles Sultan v. James Fenoglio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a prisoner “intentionally depleting his trust account to avoid paying his filing fee” would constitute grounds for denying IFP status
• “Our view [regarding a prisoner’s qualification to proceed IFP] would be different if there were evidence that [a prisoner] was intentionally depleting his trust account to avoid paying his filing fee”
• “Our view [regarding a prisoner’s qualification to proceed IFP] would be different if there were evidence that [a prisoner] was intentionally depleting his trust account to avoid paying his filing fee”
• “Our view [regarding a prisoner’s qualification to proceed IFP] would be different if there were evidence that [a prisoner] was intentionally depleting his trust account to avoid paying his filing fee”
• subsequent developments in an inmate’s finances are material to the IFP determination when they No. 19-1925 Page 4 suggest that the prisoner is seeking to avoid assessment of a greater filing fee
• subsequent developments in an inmate’s finances are material to the IFP determination when they No. 19-1925 Page 4 suggest that the prisoner is seeking to avoid assessment of a greater filing fee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).