Charles Sinito Jr. (83-3791), Thomas J. Sinito (84-3018) v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• looking to the sentence imposed in deciding that an appellant was not prejudiced by the transfer of his case to a different judge
• confronting a claim that because of a ministerial error in the assignment of a previous case, the appellant’s case was randomly assigned to a different judge than it otherwise would have been
• noting a criminal defendant has no right to have a case heard by any particular judge
• a defendant does not have the right to have his or her judge selected by a random draw

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).