Charles R. Fernandez v. Department of the Army

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that retroactive application of the USERRA would “impair rights a party possessed when he acted, increase a party’s liability for past conduct, or impose new duties with respect to transactions already completed” (quoting Landgraf, 511 U.S. at 280)
• explaining that the protection for employment benefits under the VRRA covered only reservists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).