Charles Pointer v. Dart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an evidentiary error warrants a new trial when it affects a party’s “substantial rights”
• holding that a subpoena must seek relevant matters
• holding that a subpoena must seek relevant matters
• “A subpoena must also seek relevant information” (citing Roberts v. Shawnee Mission Ford, Inc., 352 F.3d 358, 360-62 (8th Cir. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).