Charles P. La Placa v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “appellant’s belief that the statements he made were false need not be proved by the ‘two witness rule;’ and that in appropriate circumstances belief of falsity may be inferred by proof of the falsity itself”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).