Charles Michael Kincade v. Amanda Wooldridge Kincade
Syllabus
This appeal arises from a divorce the primary issues on appeal pertain to the permanent parenting plan. During the pendency of the divorce and following a successful mediation, the parties entered into a Marital Dissolution Agreement and a Permanent Parenting Plan. Six weeks later, Father filed a notice of withdrawal of his consent to the mediated parenting plan. Subsequently, an order was entered approving the Marital Dissolution Agreement and declaring the parties divorced, reserving the issue of a permanent parenting plan for trial. Following the trial, the court established a permanent parenting plan similar to the mediated plan with four modifications. When Mother's counsel submitted the final order for the court's approval, it contained three alternatives for the \right-of-first-refusal\ provision, which was one of the four modifications. The trial court approved one of the \right-of-first-refusal\ alternatives and entered the final order. Father appeals, arguing the trial court abused its discretion in its formulation of the parenting plan and in awarding Mother her attorney's fees. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm. We also award Mother the reasonable and necessary attorney's fees she incurred on appeal.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence should not be excluded if it is offered to interpret the terms of a contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Presiding Judge Frank G. Clement, Jr.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.