· 10/1/1953
Charles M. Dunning Const. Co. v. United States
Citations
- 115 F. Supp. 250
- 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “[t]he fiduciary obligations of an attorney are not served by his later selection of the interests of one client over another” (citing Valente v. Pepsico, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 361, 368 (D. Del. 1975)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vaught
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.