Charles KELLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prejudice is shown when “the ALJ did not consider all of the evidence in the record in reaching [her] decision.”
• holding that the claimant failed to show prejudice where he made no allegations that the record as a whole was incomplete or that additional favorable evidence would have been offered and the ALJ’s opinion was “quite thorough”
• holding, to show prejudice, the claimant must show “the ALJ did not have all of the relevant evidence before him in the record”
• noting that the claimant’s hearing was “less than totally satisfactory” but concluding that the claimant suffered no prejudice and therefore remand was unwarranted
• There is no prejudice ™ the 15 a assertion that the plaintiff would have benefitted from a more’ extensive hearing was speculative.
• There is no prejudice when the assertion that the plaintiff would have benefitted from a more extensive hearing was speculative.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).