Charles Jonas Hasselmann v. State of Iowa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that states possessed the power to promote temperance through regulation
• finding that North Dakota’s regulatory scheme, which was enacted, in part, to promote temperance, was “unquestionably legitimate”
• invalidating local ordinances prohibiting military recruiters from contacting teenagers because the ordinances “s[ought] to directly regulate the conduct of agents of the federal government”
• invalidating local ordinances prohibiting military recruiters from contacting teenagers because the ordinances “s[ought] to directly regulate the conduct of agents of the federal government”
• identifying “the interest of promoting temperance, ensuring orderly market conditions, and raising revenue”
• requiring state regulations to be “imposed on some basis unrelated to the object’s status as a Government contractor or supplier, that is, . . . imposed equally on other similarly situated constituents of the State”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).